Skip links

Aggregator vs Marketplace: Which Online Business Model is Right for You?

So you have a great idea for an online business. Maybe it’s a platform to connect buyers and sellers, a hub to centralize information or a way to aggregate content from across the web. How do you decide whether to build an aggregator site or a marketplace?

The choice between an aggregator and a marketplace model is crucial. It impacts everything from your technology stack to your growth strategy. However many entrepreneurs struggle to select the right approach for their needs.

In this post, we’ll examine the key differences between aggregators and marketplaces. You’ll learn the pros and cons of each model. And you’ll walk away with clarity on which option is best for your online business idea.

Let’s dive in!

Aggregator and Marketplace Models: A Quick Comparison

First, what exactly are aggregators and marketplaces? Here’s a fast definition of each:

  • Aggregators curate and centralize information, products, or services from different sources into one place. Think news aggregators like Google News, product search engines like Google Shopping, or entertainment hubs like YouTube.
  • Marketplaces connect buyers and sellers within a commercial exchange. Examples include e-commerce sites like eBay, app stores like iOS App Store, and the gig economy platforms Uber and Fiverr.

In other words, aggregators consolidate things while marketplaces facilitate transactions. Aggregators bring the world to you; marketplaces bring you to the world.

With this basic distinction in mind, let’s contrast some of the key elements of these models:

Core offeringContent, information, productsTransactions, services
Key playersCurators, editors, engineersBuyers, sellers, service providers
Main valueDiscovery, access, convenienceMatchmaking, trust, safety
Revenue sourcesAdvertising, subscriptions, commissionsListing fees, commissions, transaction fees
Aggregator vs Marketplace

Looking at this comparison, aggregators seem focused on content while marketplaces enable commerce.

But the line can blur between these models. For example, Amazon aggregates product listings from sellers but also facilitates transactions as a marketplace. Similarly, YouTube provides a marketplace for advertisers while aggregating videos for consumers.

So which one should you build? Let’s analyze the tradeoffs in more detail.

Aggregator Pros and Cons

Aggregators aim to be a one-stop resource for their target users. Some of their key advantages include:

Wider content breadth

By centralizing information from diverse sources, aggregators can offer depth and breadth of content. For example, Reddit aggregates user-generated content into a single destination covering countless topics.

Platform dynamics

Aggregators benefit from network effects – they become more valuable as more users join the platform. The aggregated content acts as a flywheel fueling further growth.

Marketing leverage

Large aggregators like Yelp and TripAdvisor gain authority as discovery hubs for restaurants or travel. They can charge for promoted listings due to their valuable user base.

Diverse revenue streams

Beyond advertising, aggregators like Reddit generate revenue through premium subscriptions, commissions, and branded content.

However, aggregators also come with challenges:

High curation overhead

Maintaining high-quality, organized content requires significant human effort for moderation, curation, and editing. Automation helps but doesn’t fully eliminate this need.

Risk of staleness

If an aggregator’s content doesn’t stay fresh and updated, users get frustrated. For example, an outdated business listing on Yelp harms both users and the listed business.

Lower switching costs

Users can pivot to other aggregators fairly easily if they provide better or fresher content. Loyalty beyond convenience is hard to build.

Susceptibility to platform risk

Many aggregators rely heavily on larger platforms like search engines for distribution and traffic. Changes to these platforms’ algorithms can deeply impact traffic and revenue.

Overall, building a successful aggregator requires mastering the art of curation at scale. Let’s now examine marketplaces.

Marketplace Pros and Cons

Marketplaces unlock value by matching buyers and sellers. Their advantages include:

Clear value proposition

The marketplace value of matching supply and demand is easy to grasp for users compared to an aggregator’s more abstract value.

Built-in revenue model

Marketplaces monetize the transactions they facilitate via listing fees, commissions, etc. A natural revenue stream is baked into their model.

Stronger competitive moats

Marketplaces enjoy powerful network effects – each new user expands the supply and demand, improving utility for all participants.

Benefits for micro businesses

Small service providers can gain market access through platforms like Etsy versus setting up an entire e-commerce operation.

However, marketplaces also pose their own difficulties:

Chicken-and-egg issue

How do you get one side of the market on board without the other already present? Solving this cold-start problem requires creativity.

Trust and safety

Users need to feel confident to transact. That requires dispute resolution, ratings, and other trust-building mechanisms.

Regulatory risk

Marketplaces must navigate complex regulations in many categories like home sharing, transportation, and hiring. Compliance is challenging.

Lower loyalty

Users may multi-home across multiple marketplaces, going wherever the best deal is. Their loyalty to any one platform is limited.

In summary, marketplace builders must master the art of matchmaking – connecting users in a reliable and trusted environment.

Should You Build an Aggregator or a Marketplace?

We’ve covered the key ingredients of aggregator and marketplace startups. But how do you choose between these models for your own idea?

Here are four questions to help decide:

1. What is the core need you’re addressing?

Think about the user pain points and desires your platform alleviates. Are you primarily fulfilling an information discovery need or a transactional need? That provides a major clue.

2. How unique is your supply?

If your idea relies on aggregated content that users can get elsewhere, it may work better as a marketplace. Unique supply attracts users more easily to aggregators.

3. What is scarce: buyers or sellers?

If buyers are scarce, focus on attracting them first with an aggregator filled with great seller content. If sellers are scarce, solve their needs first with tools as a marketplace.

4. Does your model support monetization?

While aggregators can monetize through ads and subscriptions, a marketplace often monetizes more directly. If revenue is critical, lean towards a marketplace structure.

Beyond this initial assessment, your final choice may involve a hybrid model. For example, many B2B marketplaces like Alibaba also incorporate extensive content to educate their users.

You can blend attributes of aggregators and marketplaces to create the optimal fit. But having clarity on the core purpose is a great starting point.

Examples of Successful Aggregators and Marketplaces

Still unsure which approach is best? Looking at real-world examples can help illustrate the key distinctions.

Let’s examine some top aggregators and marketplaces:

Successful Aggregators

  • Yelp – By aggregating crowd-sourced reviews of local businesses, Yelp became the go-to discovery platform for dining and services.
  • Reddit – Reddit’s model of user-submitted content aggregated into threads and subreddits built one of the largest discussion platforms.
  • YouTube – From user-generated videos to professional media, YouTube provides the ultimate video aggregation destination.
  • Tripadvisor – Centralizing travel reviews and listings established Tripadvisor as a key aggregator in hospitality.

These examples demonstrate aggregators succeeding by becoming the trusted hub in their vertical for content. Now let’s examine leading marketplaces.

Successful Marketplaces

  • Uber – By matchmaking riders and drivers in a frictionless on-demand model, Uber disrupted urban transportation.
  • eBay – eBay’s auction marketplace connected buyers and sellers online years before the dominance of Amazon and Alibaba.
  • Fiverr – Fiverr introduced the masses to freelancing by building a marketplace around digital gig economy services.
  • Etsy – Etsy built a dynamic marketplace helping small creators sell handmade and vintage goods at scale.

These examples show the power of removing transactional friction through marketplaces. Both models can clearly build massive platforms under the right conditions.

Why Aggregators have Higher Gross Margins than Marketplaces and Why Marketplaces have Higher Revenues

Aggregators tend to have higher gross margins than marketplaces for a few key reasons:

  1. Lower direct costs – Aggregators have lower direct costs associated with revenue. They don’t bear the cost of goods sold as marketplaces do, giving them an advantage on gross margin.
  2. Less overhead – Maintaining and supporting a marketplace comes with higher overhead costs for things like dispute resolution, customer support, fraud prevention etc. Aggregators have less overhead.
  3. Advertising revenues – Many aggregators generate revenues from advertising which is highly profitable. The gross margins on advertising often exceed 80-90%, far higher than marketplace transaction fees.

As for why marketplaces tend to generate higher revenues overall, there are also a few factors:

  1. Direct monetization – Every transaction a marketplace enables can be monetized, creating a direct revenue stream. Aggregators rely more on indirect streams like advertising.
  2. Higher volume – By bringing together buyers and sellers, marketplaces can unlock higher transaction volumes and frequency over an aggregator.
  3. Marketplace fees – Transaction fees, listing fees and commissions marketplaces charge provide less upside constraints on revenue compared to relying just on advertising and content revenues.
aggregators have higher gross margins marketplaces have higher revenues
Aggregators have higher gross margins. Marketplaces have higher revenues

Build an Aggregator or Marketplace? Why Not Both?

The rise of platforms like Amazon Marketplace and YouTube shows how aggregator and marketplace models can fuse together at scale.

When exploring your initial idea, assessing your core purpose helps point you toward an aggregator or marketplace approach. This decision then shapes your technology, product design, and go-to-market strategy.

However, over time, a successful platform can evolve to incorporate elements of both models. For example, a content aggregator like Yelp can add transactions via food delivery. Or a transportation marketplace like Uber can aggregate more premium services through Uber Eats and Uber Freight.

The key is establishing a solid foundation as one model first before expanding to incorporate qualities of the other. This helps maintain focus in your platform’s formative stages while layering on new functionality over time.

So don’t worry about committing 100% to an aggregator or marketplace at the outset. Assess your initial goal and vision. Then build a minimum viable product tailored to one model and evolve from there.

Which Model is Right for You?

Here’s a self-assessment you can do to figure out which model to pursue. Answer these 5 questions:

  1. What core user need does your platform address?

Information discovery/content access – a better fit for an aggregator
Connecting buyers and sellers – better fit for a marketplace

  1. Will your business rely on unique, hard-to-access supply or content?

Yes – aggregator model likely better
No – marketplace model likely better

  1. Which side of your platform is scarcer for you to acquire initially?

Buyers – attract them with a content-rich aggregator first
Sellers/service providers – get them on board first with a marketplace

  1. How critical is having a built-in monetization model from the start?

Very important – marketplace easier to monetize from day one
Less important – aggregator can work if you prioritize growth first

  1. Are you passionate about mastering content curation or making matches between customers?

Content curation & aggregation – build an aggregator
Making meaningful matches – build a marketplace


More “aggregator” answers – aggregator model likely fits you better More “marketplace” answers – marketplace model likely fits you better A mix – Consider a hybrid model

Deciding between an aggregator and a marketplace can be tough. Assessing your core purpose and user needs provides clarity.

For example, if you’re addressing frustration around discovering local events, an aggregator model may work best. But if you want to help home cooks monetize their cooking skills, a marketplace is likely a better fit out of the gate.

Here are some final tips as you choose your direction:

  • Start niche. Target a focused use case rather than a broad horizontal. Aggregators and marketplaces often start very targeted.
  • Consider blending. You don’t have to be rigid. Mixing some marketplace transactions into your aggregator or vice versa can work.
  • Solve the chicken-and-egg. Figure out clever ways to prime both sides of your market, either through aggregating supply or seeding key demand.
  • Iterate and adapt. Keep tweaking your model based on user feedback until you achieve product-market fit.

Choosing between an aggregator and a marketplace is an exciting first step. Ultimately your goal is creating a platform users love built around a compelling purpose. By picking the right initial model to address core needs, you set your new business up for success.

The world eagerly awaits new platforms that connect us and empower us. With the right strategic foundation, perhaps your aggregator or marketplace will be next!

Related Posts

Leave a comment